Will the United-Continental merger receive U.S. government approval?
This page is protected by Copyright laws. Do Not Copy.

Harbor pilots group criticizes study

October 22, 2009

The Florida Harbor Pilots Association (FHPA) rejected the outcome of a study that calls the state's pilot system a monopoly that limits pilot numbers and inflates pilots average salaries to $368,000 per year.

The study, commissioned by the Florida Alliance of Maritime Organizations (FAMO), said that harbor pilots make more than $4,000 an hour in some ports. Harbor pilots board cargo and cruise ships and help guide them through congested harbors.

FHPA spokeswoman Sarah Bascom said the organization’s concerns with the study were "numerous."

Bascom said the salary quoted in the study was "too high," but said the association doesn’t keep track of members' average paychecks because harbor pilots are paid by how much they work. So in busy ports like Miami, pilots make much more than in slower ports like Pensacola.

"We focus on the rates," Bascom said. "The rates are set and reviewed by the pilot rate review board, by tonnage and the length of ship. There is a very regimented system in place to deal with the rates. They don’t mention rates because they can’t. Our rates are among the lowest in the country and the lowest on the Eastern Seaboard."

Bascom said that the FHPA was not consulted for the study.

She said the bid was rejected because pilots are private and the state said it could not freeze rates on a position that is not state-funded.

"FAMO is a group of foreign-flagged ships that do not want to spend the money to have a state-mandated harbor pilot," Bascom said. "They make billions in profits, and they don’t think it behooves them to pay $200,000 to $300,000 per year to keep ports safe?"

Bascom said the study did not take into account harbor pilots' level of expertise, experience and training. She said the average harbor pilot has a naval or maritime degree and eight to 12 years of experience.

"They are extremely skilled, highly trained and have a very specific skill set," she said. "You don’t want somebody with the least amount of experience making the least amount of money doing this job. If there were an incident, it would shut down that port."

From 1 to 5 of 12 Comment(s)

Leave a Comment

#12October 24, 2009
Pilots everywhere in the world are run as government regulated, non-competitive enterprises to provide for safety in confined waters. Florida Pilots do not test themselves, the State does. They do not set the rates, an independent State Board with no Pilots on it sets the rates. Each port keeps the number of Pilots necessary for safety. Modern technology is an excellent tool which has been embraced and developed by Pilots but is no justification to get rid of Pilots. The ships are bigger and the channels are not. Pilots are needed now more than ever. I am happy to pay a buck or two of my cruise fare to make sure I am safe and the environment is protected. Human error happens, I'll take my chances on American, local experienced Pilots over foreign ship officers beholden to the cruise ship companies. Pilots are accountable to the citizens. Get your facts straight! Safety First!
#11October 24, 2009
You FAMO guys can stop commenting on the article now.
#10October 24, 2009
Pilot fees are not included in port taxes.
#9October 23, 2009
First,these men and woman must meet specific qualifications before they can sit to take the port specific exam, which is 3 days long. They are definitely QUALIFIED. And just because there is new technology on board these vessels does not mean that they are capable of moving safely in and out of ports where the weather and port conditions are constantly changing. These ships are not registered in this country and therefore have not met US safety standards, plus they don't bring revenue to our country but take it away.
#8October 23, 2009
The rates are low but the profits are high. Who cares?
View All Comments

Leave a Comment

Comment Guidelines

Your
Comment:
characters remaining