The top European city for landmark-focused tourism is:
This page is protected by Copyright laws. Do Not Copy.

House passes cruise safety bill

October 23, 2009

The House voted Thursday to require the cruise industry to be more transparent in reporting cruise ship crime and comply with new cabin security and surveillance measures.

CLIA backs the current version of the Cruise Vessel Safety and Security Act of 2009. It didn't back an earlier version with a clause enabling relatives of cruise ship crime victims to recover damages for emotional suffering and bereavement.

CLIA worked with victims rights groups and lawmakers over the summer to revise the bill.

"This legislation codifies many existing regulations and industry practices while also setting forth additional safety requirements," said CLIA in a statement.

The bill mandates a minimum height for railing as well as peepholes and security latches on cabin doors.

The law also would require cruise lines to report crimes on a website operated by the U.S. Coast Guard.

Ship personnel would be required to contact the FBI to report incidents involving homicide, assaults or missing U.S. nationals as soon as they occur, even in international waters.

In addition, ships would be required to deploy technology to detect passengers who fall overboard, if and when that technology becomes available.

The bill now goes to the Senate floor for a vote.

The bill was introduced by Rep. Doris Matsui (D-Calif.) after one of her constituents was sexually assaulted on a cruise by a ship employee in 2006.

"For far too long, American families and particularly young women have unknowingly been at risk when signing up for cruise vacations," Matsui said in a statement.

"The passage of this legislation will not only help recent victims of cruise crimes and offer them enhanced protection, but will help from preventing further crimes from happening."

From 1 to 5 of 5 Comment(s)

Leave a Comment

#5November 03, 2009
At #4: please enlighten us. With the population on cruise ships at any given time, the festive nature of many, and party 'til you puke mentality of a few, I'm sure it happens all to often but have never read of any such incidents. Perhaps the cruise lines subdue it as much as possible, avoiding any negative press, as any bad news does not make for good business.
#4October 26, 2009
It is unfortunate no one takes into account the number of assaults and abuses by passengers against crew.
#3October 26, 2009
With 10% unemployment, foreclosures going through the roof and billions being proposed for forced medical insurance and Congress spends time on this kind of nonsense. Perhaps Congresswomen Matsui ought to tell her constituents how many jobs this bill will create. Come on Congress quit fiddling while Rome appears to be ready to catch fire.
#2October 24, 2009
The bill sounds reasonable, and not super expensive to impliment, except possibly future technology to detect "jumpers" overboard. I say jumpers, because on most cruise ships in service now, it is not easy to fall off. With a minimum height mandate in the bill, it should eliminate any possible accidental Man Over Board. One can bet there is some company working on the jumper detector technology now. I wonder if it is an insider to the bill? Peep holes and security latches are inexpensive and already in place on many ships. While Rep. Matsui pats herself on the back, there really is nothing much in the bill preventing another sexual assult that appears as her motive for introducing it. So one looks thru the peep hole and see's room service or a cabin steward, unlocks the deadbolt, opens the door and is assulted by one bad apple out of 100,000 crew members...
#1October 23, 2009
In response to the good Congresswomen from California, I daresay more young women have been assaulted at land-based resorts at a much greater rate than on a cruise ship. There's a price tag for all of these "nanny state" laws and the consumer will pay for essentially nothing better than what exisits today. Instead of penalizing a successful business why not give them incentives to hire more US nationals with tax breaks?

Leave a Comment

Comment Guidelines

Your
Comment:
characters remaining