The top European city for landmark-focused tourism is:
This page is protected by Copyright laws. Do Not Copy.

Momentum grows for lifting of Cuba travel ban

November 23, 2009

Efforts in the U.S. to end the 46-year-old travel ban to Cuba got a boost last week during a hearing in Washington on whether to lift the ban.

The hearing by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on the Freedom to Travel Cuba Act (H.R. 874), introduced by Rep. William Delahunt (D-Mass.) on Feb. 4, marked the first time since Democrats took control of Congress in 2007 that a full committee has delved into the hotly contested issue of lifting the restrictions.

Proponents claim the bill has 179 co-sponsors in the House. The Senate version, introduced by Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) on Feb. 12 as S. 428, claims 33 co-sponsors.

Opponents of lifting the ban suggest the votes are not there to pass the legislation.

The U.S.-Cuba Democracy Public Action Committee, a group that champions the U.S. embargo, maintains that 53 House Democrats still support current U.S. policy toward Cuba, including keeping the trade embargo and travel restrictions in place.

The House hearing on Nov. 19 included testimony by Orbitz Worldwide, which launched its Open Cuba campaign in May.

Orbitz has gathered more than 100,000 signatures on its petition to end the ban, "sending a powerful message to U.S. lawmakers and to President Obama that the time to act is now," according to Orbitz.

The testimony included endorsements from industry partners and associations, which support Orbitz’s efforts to open travel to Cuba, including the National Foreign Trade Council, National Tour Association, the U.S. Tour Operators Association, the Adventure Travel Trade Association and the Interactive Travel Services Association.

Several Cuban American groups signed on as well, including the Cuban American Commission for Family Rights and the Cuban American Alliance Education Fund.

During the hearing, Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.), committee chairman, read portions of an essay he had received from Cuban blogger and island dissident Yoani Sanchez, who said that lifting the ban on U.S. travel to China "could bring more results in the democratization of Cuba than the indecisive performance of Raul Castro."

Sanchez recently was in the news when she claimed she was kidnapped in Havana by Cuban security officers while on her way to an anti-violence demonstration. She said she was accused of being a counter revolutionary and was subsequently beaten by her captors and then released.

Sanchez later posed seven questions to both Obama and Raul Castro as part of her campaign to open dialogue between the two leaders.

In his email response, Obama restated his administration’s policies on Cuba, including more bilateral and people-to-people contacts and improved human rights, while insisting on "actions by the Cuban government."

Raul Castro has not replied.

From 1 to 5 of 10 Comment(s)

Leave a Comment

#10December 07, 2009
@#4 Why do you think the ban is unconstitutional?
#9December 05, 2009
#4 LOL! How is the ban unconstitutional? Where are we granted the right of free passage? Especially To Cuba of all places? ~ Had we kept it in 1898, we would have prevented all kinds of issues 60 some years later; but keeping it was not our objective.
#8December 04, 2009
There are people who want to go to Cuba and our government prevents them. The only justification is that we want to undermine the Castro regime. The ban has been in effect for 50 years and doesn't seem to have nudged the Castros out of power. Time to try something different, eh?
#7December 03, 2009
If you think that travel to Cuba would spread democracy, think again. Our dollars are sure helping the economies of China, Russia and Vietnam while the dictaors are keeping a stranglehold on their countiy's freedom. These 3 distant dictatorships and far from the 90 miles that separate Cuba from the US.
#6December 02, 2009
The ban out-lived its' need and intent. The missile crisis is long past. The Cold War is over. The Berlin Wall is down. The Soviet Union is no more and is not proping up Cuba. Castro will not return to power. The Threat is gone. It is past time for the ban to end. It is not helping anything or anybody. It does prevent us from traveling there, and it does prevent us from selling the destination. Imagine the travel business it would generate, and the stimulus it would casue.
View All Comments

Leave a Comment

Comment Guidelines

Your
Comment:
characters remaining