The top European city for landmark-focused tourism is:
This page is protected by Copyright laws. Do Not Copy.

TSA maintains leaked screening manual poses no threat to public

December 10, 2009

The Transportation Security Administration came under heavy fire this week for inadvertently posting its "sensitive security" aviation screening manual online.

The TSA quickly pulled the manual off the web -- and tried to soften the breach by calling the manual outdated -- but the leak sparked sharp criticism from lawmakers and those in the industry who fear the agency may have provided terrorists with valuable information they could use to circumvent national air travel security measures.

The manual remains available online at several different sites.

"The Transportation Security Administration recognizes an outdated, unclassified version of a Standard Operating Procedures document was improperly posted by the agency to the Federal Business Opportunities website wherein redacted information was not properly protected," the TSA said in a statement.

"Once we were made aware, it was immediately taken down," the TSA said. "There have been six newer versions of the procedures since the version posted was approved."

Lawmakers still want to know how the manual wound up on the Internet in the first place.

Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) asked during a previously scheduled oversight hearing on DHS security issues yesterday: "Who should be held accountable?"

Speaking at that hearing, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said the manual was posted online by a contractor, who had reported to TSA supervisors.

"It was an out-of-date manual," Napolitano said. Making it public, she said, poses no security risks for air travelers, she added.

Still, she said, "The posting of it did not meet our own standards of what should be available on the net."

While the DHS has already disciplined the appropriate employees for their involvement in the incident, Napolitano said she has asked the DHS Inspector General's office to investigate.

From 1 to 2 of 2 Comment(s)

Leave a Comment

#2December 11, 2009
Uh Huh....We trust everything Janet Napolitano says. Isn't she the one who said the 9/11 terrorists came from Canada? I'm thinking she isn't the most reliable source of correct info. Doesn't exactly instill a sense of confidence in homeland security now does it.
#1December 11, 2009
Brushed off as "outdated". Posting it for the world to see, made it that way. SIX, newer versions since it was posted? Six complete re-writes does not even sound sort of believeable. If ever such documents are de-classified it is decades after they are outdated, or no longer current. It is a serious matter and breach of security. Someone must be held accountable and delt with appropriately; not minimized, bushed aside, and dismissed as it appears it was or will be.

Leave a Comment

Comment Guidelines

Your
Comment:
characters remaining