Will the United-Continental merger receive U.S. government approval?
This page is protected by Copyright laws. Do Not Copy.

U.K. hotels call for tight regulation of hotel reviews

February 16, 2010

Uproar in Britain over TripAdvisor's "dirtiest hotels" list has reignited calls for tighter regulations to ensure that consumer reviews on such websites are legitimate.

Bob Cotton, president of the British Hotel Association, said he and other hotel association heads in Europe were planning to talk to the European Union about strengthening laws governing review sites.

"The line I am taking is: At the end of the day … you can’t stop them from doing what they are doing, but I think what we should be asking is that they ensure that if they do put comments on, that the person at least stayed in the hotel," Cotton said.

Cotton said hotels would like to see a law that makes websites responsible for verifying the validity of reviews before they are posted.

"I was in a meeting a few weeks ago with my counterparts across Europe, and we thought that was a sensible approach, to have a conversation in Brussels," he said. "Customers want to know if the comments that are made are genuine."

The debate is far from new. As long as consumer-generated-review sites have been around, there have been questions about whether some hoteliers have gone online, posing as consumers, to boost their reputation or trash their competitors.

In response to news reports about the uproar in Britain, the American Hotel & Lodging Association conducted an online poll asking readers of its daily SmartBrief if they thought such standards were necessary.

Seventy-nine percent of respondents responded that, yes, "the system makes it too easy for competitors to unfairly tarnish or destroy a hotel’s reputation."

Twenty-one percent said no, that "the system is democratic and the number of legitimate reviews will nearly always outnumber the bogus ones."

Brian Payea, a spokesman for TripAdvisor, said there are already laws on the books in the U.S. and E.U. that make it illegal to post fraudulent reviews. And he said TripAdvisor aggressively investigates allegations of fraud.

"If you submit a review, you actually have to click that you agree to abide by these standards," he said. "And the U.S. and European standards are specifically called out in that document."

He noted that New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo last year won a $300,000 settlement with a cosmetic surgery company that posted false consumer reviews on its website. That case is believed to be the first to target a practice that has been dubbed "astroturfing."

TripAdvisor also has an area where owners and managers who are registered with the site can report questionable reviews, he said.

"When the hotels let us know they think it is happening, that gives us the ammunition to launch an investigation, and we’ve had some of those turn up some very interesting stuff," Payea said.

TripAdvisor has a number of penalties it can impose if it finds hoteliers have written reviews about themselves or their competitors, including dropping the properties ranking on the site’s popularity index, he said.

From 1 to 5 of 15 Comment(s)

Leave a Comment

#15March 05, 2010
Tripadvisor allows false reviews to be published. It is unfortunate that this form of slander is allowed to exist, and that a company is trying to profit from it. It is only a matter of time before the consumer realizes that this website has no relevance and is therefore unreliable and useless. They may claim to be forcing hotels to do a better job, but they are really just causing damage to hotels. The more hotels that go out of business, the higher the rates become. In the end, Tripadvisor hurts the consumer more than it helps.
#14February 24, 2010
I have used TripAdvisor extensively and post reviews whenever I can. I can usually spot a fraudulent post and I am sure that the experts report these fraudulent posts regularly. I note that TripAdvisor has often removed posts. The service is a great one for travellers and hotels who want it removed are probably the ones that have something to worry about. Even the smallest B&B can get a good review and be appreciative. The bigger they are the harder they fall.
#13February 23, 2010
Totally agree, a confirmation number of reservations confirmed would also bring the culprit to view. It is very disconcerting to read these totally inaccurate comments of employees who have chose to destroy a hotel. In recent years I came across a deluxe property which had been completed converted, and trashed on TripAdvisor. I contacted the representative, and the inaccuracies were removed from the site.
#12February 18, 2010
I agree with #6 Trip Advisor serves no verifiable purpose and should not be available to the public. TA points the finger to whoever posted it. Once the damage is done, it's done.
#11February 18, 2010
There are always professional reviews, such as what's on Star Service. An earlier commentor noted that it is limited in how many properties it can review (since it has to pay reviewers), but at least you have a better chance of accurate information.
View All Comments

Leave a Comment

Comment Guidelines

Your
Comment:
characters remaining