The top European city for landmark-focused tourism is:
This page is protected by Copyright laws. Do Not Copy.

New United unit focuses on ancillary revenue

November 11, 2009

United CEO says middlemen get too much of the pie

United CEO Glenn Tilton wants his airline to get more of its own revenue pie, believing that too many other parties in the air transport value chain are getting more than their fair share.

"Those of us that actually transport passengers from A to B to C to D realize less value from that business than virtually any of those involved in a collateral context," he said. "We actually retain for ourselves very little. It’s time to rebalance the value chain."

In an interview during a gathering of Star Alliance executives at Newark Airport last month, Tilton called it "a distortion of value."

His comments echoed remarks that he and other airline executives made earlier this year that angered travel agents, GDSs and others in the distribution chain.

American CEO Gerard Arpey, for example, said in an April conference call with analysts that he "could see a day" when agents and others acting as an intermediary between the airlines and their customers would have to pay for access to the airline’s product.

The old paradigm where airlines pay distributors has been shifting, Arpey said, because the airlines have been able to cut domestic commissions, domestic overrides and booking fees.

Shortly after Arpey’s comments, Delta CEO Richard Anderson told analysts "the industry has to evolve" to a point where companies are paying for airline content instead of the other way around.

About the same time, United President John Tague told analysts that his airline would work diligently to "manage distribution channels to minimize cost."

"There has been significant progress on GDS expenses, particularly in the international market," Tague said. "We are aggressively trying to move down the fixed commission, especially in Asia. Clearly, this is a very large expense item that doesn’t make any money."

At the Star event, Tilton warned there were no "sacred cows," and the airline would continue to be aggressive in this area.

Peter von Moltke, CEO of UBM Aviation, said carriers seem to be moving against their distributors because they can’t quantify the value the distributors bring to the airlines.

"There’s been very little analysis of the economic benefit they bring," he said. "Airlines have to look at the whole value chain, not just where they can cut."

The historical problem in doing that kind of analysis, he said, is that airlines have been unwilling to share how much it costs to do the kind of distribution and marketing work that outside distributors provide.

— Michael Fabey

United, a leader among legacy airlines in generating ancillary revenue, is marshalling its resources to come up with even more fees and better ways to package and market them.

Looking for new ancillary revenue streams is vital to the airline, CEO Glenn Tilton said.

"It is so important we actually are putting a unit together that is focused solely on ancillary-revenue generation," Tilton said in an interview last month at a gathering of Star alliance executives at Newark Airport to welcome Continental into the alliance.

Tilton said the unit would be named Merchandising.

The new unit’s name reflects the feeling by United and other carrier executives that the new fees represent more than just a bunch of trendy tacked-on charges.

Jay Sorensen, president of the IdeaWorks consultancy, which publishes the "Ancillary Revenue and A La Carte Guide," likes the idea of a new unit and its "merchandising" moniker.

"I think there is much to do in this area," Sorensen said. "For example, you’ve seen airline snack boxes — you know, the ones sold for $7 that have a plain white exterior and the logo of the airline. Can you imagine this very same box in a grocery store? They’d never sell. Why? Because the packaging was designed by the airline brand police and not by a designer who has worked for a consumer products company.

"And how are these boxes sold? Yes, on the very same trolleys that were used for giving away free food," he said. "Basically, it’s a process that has seen zero innovation. This is where merchandising can make all the difference."

How airlines view these charges does matter, said Peter von Moltke, CEO of UBM Aviation. "Ancillary revenue is an extension of the cultural mindset of an airline," he said.

Few airlines have been as active as United in identifying such products.The carier recently started an annual checked-bag subscription, enabling passengers to pay one yearly fee to take care of their baggage charges.

United has been rewarded for its efforts: The airline tallied about $276 million in ancillary revenue for the second quarter, surpassed only by Delta’s $924 million and Continental’s $277 million.

In all, the nation’s nine top airlines reported about $2.4 billion for the quarter in ancillary revenue.

Like United, other carriers are looking for more ways to create new revenue streams, especially in the absence of backlash to the fees. The airlines started charging extra fees last year to compensate for fuel price spikes. The practice continued through this year to help them cope with the recession.

As the airlines started to charge for checked bags, more passengers opted to leave their bags at home, said airline executives.

"What we’re seeing is a behavior change," US Airways CEO Doug Parker said at the Star gathering.

While some passengers complain of being hit with nickel-and-dime charges, airline executives continue to defend the fees as equitable.

"As we seek additional revenues, we can give the customers choice of the product and service they want," said Continental President Jeff Smisek. "The addition of these service fees is more fair."

Asked if Star partners could integrate ancillary revenue plans, Parker cautioned, "It gets really tricky because it gets into pricing the product. When you start messing with pricing the product, certain airlines have different cultures. It’s harder to do across the alliance. Furthermore, we can’t talk about pricing with each other, absent any antitrust immunity."

Sorensen said he doubted alliances could pull it off: "I generally see the alliances as an impediment to innovation, not an inspiration for innovation."

From 1 to 5 of 12 Comment(s)

Leave a Comment

#12November 13, 2009
Transportation is your business but you fail at this every day. What makes you think by adding other "services" will save your company. If you are unable to provide your basic service why would you try to build on that. You conduct business on a falt line ready to break down every day. You scheme ways of making more money by charging extra fees but fail in the basics of your own business. Transportation. You schedule connecting flights with too little time to connect. You deliberatly mislead travelers into thinking you will preform as described in you scheduling by consistently changing flight numbers to make them appear to be new flights. When, truth be know, you have only changed the flight number to prevent travelers from knowing that flight is preforming at below acceptable levels. Now you wonder why you can not make money. Get back to basics. Provide reliable transportation.
#11November 13, 2009
I truly believe in the Ala Carte service charges. I would even go so far as leveling charges for EVERY carry-on bag larger than a small tote that is brought onboard the aircraft. (It certainly would make the boarding process MORE MANAGEABLE and eliminate the scrambling at the end to stow items and take delays at the gate due to a lack of space). Too many passengers TAKE ADVANTAGE of the situation and couldn't care less whether ALL PASSENGERS are accomodated.....END the Survival of the Rudest Scenario!
#10November 12, 2009
Peter Von Moltke represents some forward thinking . The airlines would do well to heed his words. The airlines realize the great value that the travel agent distribution system provides; Not only are we passenger providers, we are also their only direct goodwill ambassadors. The airlines know this,but havehoodwinked all concerned into thinking that distribution costs are of concern.
#9November 12, 2009
...customize the experience. I pay the airline to transport ME from point A to point B safely. I can choose to add on to that experience by having them check my bags so I don't have to schlep them. I can pay for a preferred seat. If I don't want to make my own reservation, I can pay for the one-to-one conversation to have it made for me. But if all I want is a cheaper ticket to get me where I'm going, I don't have to elect all the other stuff. Once upon a time all this stuff was rolled together into the fare and we all paid for each others' bags and meals and one-on-one service. Now, they are unbundled to give you the choice of what you value. Pick your poison, folks...do you want somewhat higher fares with everything bundled again or have a lower fare and you customize your experience? Take the bundled approach and you'll all be complaining about how high fares are!
#8November 12, 2009
I worked on the travel agency side of the industry for 10 years and have been on the technology side now for 5 working with airlines. If you are with an agency or are the general public, I guarantee you you have no clue what goes on at an airline and what it takes to keep planes flying. Travel agencies, you are not innocent in all the "add on" fees. All of the top 5 TMCs I worked for nickel-and-dimed their clients. Fees to issue the ticket, fees to exchange the ticket, fees to refund the ticket, fees to run a report, account mgmt fees, etc. Your product is consolidated travel data. Your services, which you charge for, are the travel consultants, 24-hour services, leisure travel consultations, etc. Every industry has its basic product and the add-on "services" that provide a more robust experience. For an airline, the product is TRANSPORTATION. Everything else is a way to...
View All Comments

Leave a Comment

Comment Guidelines

Your
Comment:
characters remaining