How much extra would you pay to reserve an exit-row airline seat?
This page is protected by Copyright laws. Do Not Copy.

Caribbean objects to U.K. air tax, but Britain isn't budging

November 23, 2009

Caribbean tourism ministers have drawn a line in the sand, demanding that Britain's Air Passenger Duty tax be recalculated and reduced for travel to the Caribbean.

Britain, however, has made it clear that it will neither roll back nor change the controversial tax, which took effect Nov. 1.

British lawmakers tout the tax as an environmental measure aimed at taxing aviation's carbon emissions.

Under the new tax, the British government has a four-tier banding system, set at intervals of 2,000 miles from London, with the tax amount based on the distance between London and the capital cities of the countries where the flights land.

The U.S. is in Band B (2,000 to 4,000 miles from London), so the amount of the tax is calculated on the distance from London to Washington, 3,600 miles. Caribbean countries are in Band C because their capitals are between 4,001 and 6,000 miles from London.

At issue is the competitive nature of the different tax rates. Previously, only two bands were used to tally the tax: $16 for European economy-class travel and $62 ($130 in premium classes) for all other destinations, including the Caribbean.

Now the distance-based duty on air tickets from the U.K. to the Caribbean is $82 in economy and $164 in premium class.

In November 2010, the fees will jump to $123 in economy and $247 in premium class.

Several Caribbean tourism ministers met recently in London with U.K. members of Parliament and were informed that the tax would not be scrapped.

Allen Chastanet, minister of tourism for St. Lucia, said that a paper has been submitted to the British government requesting that Caribbean countries be viewed as one group, so that the tax for flights to the region be calculated on the distance between London and Bermuda (3,445 miles), the closest island to London. Bermuda also is in Band B, the same as the U.S.

Caribbean ministers plan to bring up the matter at the next meeting of the International Civil Aviation Organization in Trinidad, from Dec. 8 to 11.

"We are leading a charge with the Americans and also the Canadians to say that this is an illegal tax. The British government is charging a tax over people's airspace. We are going to try everything we can to show that this is not the way forward," Chastanet said.

Travelers from the U.K. to the Caribbean last year totaled 1.2 million, according to the Caribbean Tourism Organization. Visitor arrivals through September to the region's various islands are down anywhere from 5% to 19%.

Based on the increased costs of travel now in effect from the U.K. to the Caribbean, there is a strong likelihood that visitor traffic from England will continue to decrease, according to Chastanet and other ministers.

Tourism ministers have been joined in their lobbying efforts by dozens of hotel firms and other industry associations, including CTO, the Caribbean Hotel and Tourism Association, the European Tour Operators Association, the World Travel and Tourism Council and IATA.

"Taxes won't reduce emissions, and making travel more expensive will not stimulate the economy," said Giovanni Bisignani, IATA's director general and CEO.

From 1 to 3 of 3 Comment(s)

Leave a Comment

#3December 02, 2009
Come November 2010 it will be cheaper for UK based travellers to take a short-haul to Amsterdam and start the long-haul journey from there and I will be surprised if some airlines do not promote that option. I was recently speaking to a UK Department of Transport civil servant who told me they had lobbied against the 'tax' but were told in no uncertain terms it was a Treasury matter. Environmental...nonsense...it's a revenue raising opportunity covered in greenwash.
#2November 30, 2009
This will only serve to further discourage airtravel having not only a negative impact on the airlines but the many other tourist and none tourist related busines, particularly in the Caribbean. This is a zone with economies that are heavily driven and supported by tourism, and further decline can and will most likely criple their already frigile economies. To think that the majority of the tiny nations were once British Colonies beggers belief. certainly sense must prevail.
#1November 27, 2009
Everyone needs to unite and challenge these taxes. Air travellers are being gouged when the tax exceeds the cost of airfare for the trip. No wonder airlines are struggling to survive. The UK needs to open the books so the travelling public can see where their tax money is being spent. Meanwhile, we should all be looking for other routes to Europe that avoid the UK as much as possible, or enter the UK from other European cities if they can. The UK depends a great deal on tourism, they do everything they can to attract visitors, but now it seems they want to deter them. There are plenty of beautiful places to go for vacation, with better weather and better places for business and incentive meetings. If they are not careful, business more meetings will move to video conferencing and the UK will lose a lot more than just these excessive taxes.

Leave a Comment

Comment Guidelines

Your
Comment:
characters remaining