week ago in this space we said American's EveryFare program deserves serious study. We gave it some serious thought, and we've come to this conclusion: The program has some good points, but for most agents American's initial offer is a bad deal.

The good points about the program are twofold: It puts Web fares in the GDS, making the GDS more useful to agents. Also, the cost-sharing deal makes the GDS more attractive to American. That's good, too, because it's in agents' best interests for airlines to feel good about the GDS sales channel.

We've heard agents say that American's GDS costs are "not my problem." Maybe not. But if airlines start abandoning GDS distribution because of rising costs, many agents may have many more problems.

So to the extent that the EveryFare program addresses those issues, it is good.

But it's not good enough.

For starters, the five-year contract is too long. The only benefit to agents -- access to Web fares -- addresses a problem that may be short-lived. In five years, some confluence of regulatory and competitive pressures might put Web fares into the GDS anyway, or make both of them disappear.

There are many other things that American could offer to its agents in such a deal, including guaranteed access to all products or a promise not to undersell the trade. But it drew the line at Web fares.

If the contract is too narrow in what it offers to agents, it is overly broad in what it gives to American: Agents are to subsidize not just the GDS costs of American's Web fares, but all its other fares as well.

And some of the contract terms seem harsh and restrictive. Section 7, to take just one example, prohibits agents from adding a service fee to AA fares that is higher than the fee for "any other airline." Understandably, American doesn't want its cost-sharing deal to result in extra service fees on AA tickets.

But the broad wording prohibits AA-specific fees for any reason. If American or an AA code-share partner adopts some new procedure that raises agency costs, quite apart from EveryFare, agents could not add a carrier-specific service fee to offset it.

American claims that travel agency sales account for 70% of its revenue, and it claims that it pays $400 million a year in GDS fees, a figure that it wants to cut in half. To put that in perspective, American's revenue last year came to about $19 billion. If agents generated 70% of that, we're talking $13.3 billion, which makes the GDS fees about 3% of agency revenue.

We are sympathetic to any corporation's desire to turn a $400 million cost into a $200 million cost, but if a cost item is 3% of its associated revenue, it's going to take an extraordinary effort to get it much lower.

It seems to us that if American wants to make agents its partners in that effort, it's going to have to sweeten the pot.

Comments
JDS Travel News JDS Viewpoints JDS Africa/MI