Top 15 most visited cruise sites, week ending Sept. 29
VacationsToGo: 19.07%
Carnival Cruise Lines: 11.79%
Royal Caribbean International: 9%
Princess Cruises: 5.24%
Norwegian Cruise Line: 3.97%
Cruise Critic message board: 3.42%
Cruise Critic: 3.34%
Cruises Only: 2.65%
Travelzoo Cruises: 2.63%
Cruise.com: 2.24%
Carnival.com FunPass: 2.19%
Holland America: 2.15%
Celebrity Cruises: 2.14%
Cruise Deals.com: 1.56%
Disney Cruise Line: 1.54%
Source:Hitwise
The data in this chart are based on U.S. market share vvisits, which is the percentage of onine traffic to the domain or category, from a sample of 10 million U.S. Internet users
If
Nielsen/NetRatings' data are to be believed, Imperial Majesty's Web
site, which details the voyages of the cruise line's only ship, got
more hits than the sites of Norwegian Cruise Line, Holland America
Line or Celebrity Cruises.
In terms of Web
traffic it came in fourth, behind three industry giants: Royal
Caribbean International, Carnival Cruise Lines and Princess
Cruises.
As the Internet
increasingly becomes the most important global information medium,
the accuracy of Web traffic rankings becomes more important to any
business with a Web site.
So is Imperial
Majesty wildly popular or do the top cruise lines need to hone
their Web strategies?
"Imperial might be
much more well versed at the search engine work that they do," said
P.J. Cammarata, managing partner of ThinkBigSites.com, a Web site optimization firm. "They
know what they're doing. Something about this site is getting a lot
of hits."
The problem is that
the ratings differ significantly depending on which ratings service
you check. Moreover, companies aggressively manage traffic flowing
to and through their Web sites to optimize their Web
statistics.
For example,
Cruise.com topped the results of a Sept. 25 search for "cruise" on
Google, followed by the large cruise lines: Carnival, Royal
Caribbean, Princess and NCL. But NCL didn't even make
Nielsen/NetRatings' top five.
That's because how
Web sites get ranked is a science in itself that differs depending
on the ranking method.
Companies have
always used a variety of methods to measure a Web site's traffic.
Some count hits, which are the number of visits made to any page on
a site. Then there is the unique visitors measurement, which counts
a visitor to a Web site by recording the unique Internet address of
the user's computer. Even unique visitors can be counted in
different ways.
"Whoever is doing
the ranking has to make their own judgment call," said Pauline
Connelly, owner of Pauline Connelly Web Design and e-Marketing
service in Pittsburgh. "They make rules about what's considered a
unique visit. If I'm looking at a travel site, and then 20 minutes
later I look at it again, is that a unique visit? That's up to the
different tracking companies."
Nielsen/NetRatings
said that it measured "unique audience" visits and counted a unique
visitor as anyone who goes to a Web site once in a
month.
Google's Web page
ranking system is a college course in algorithms. The company said
it used the Internet's link structure as an indicator of an
individual page's value. The more a page is linked to from other
sites, the more valuable it is in Google's ranking.
Google also
analyzes the pages that link to the page being measured. Links from
more valuable pages are weighted more heavily.
"All search engines
crave one thing and one thing only: relevant, keyword-rich,
consistent and current content. Period," Cammarata said.
"They want you to
be able to go to Google when you are searching for something and
find it on the first page. They don't want you to get frustrated
and back out of Google and go to Yahoo."
Cammarata's company
uses a proprietary blog-marketing and social-networking linking
method to get its clients onto the first page of a search engine's
results.
Rankings clearly
can be manipulated. Until it was fixed last October, any Web user
who typed the words "miserable failure" into Google's search engine
would discover that the most popular result was President George
Bush's White House biography.
Still, many people
in the Web game said that while rankings may include an anomaly,
like Imperial Cruise Line, the basic rankings should be
consistent.
While diverse
criteria employed by ranking services can make the numbers vary,
"relative positioning shouldn't change that much," said
Connelly.
Connelly, who has
been involved in Internet enterprises since 1999, now helps clients
drive business to their Web sites. She noted that whichever way it
was measured, traffic does not necessarily correspond to number of
sales. That depends on a conversion rate, or the ratio of a Web
site's visits to the number of times visitors actually do what the
Web site wants them to do. The conversion could be viewing an ad,
making a purchase, acquiring product information or calling the
company.
An important
measure of a Web site's effectiveness, or ineffectiveness, is the
bounce rate.
"If someone looks
at it and goes right off of it, that gives the site a high bounce
rate," Connelly said. "We always like to see people spend time on
the Web site."
A closer look at
Nielsen/NetRatings' data reveals that an asterisk should be placed
next to Imperial Majesty's high ranking: The average user spent
only 47 seconds on its Web site.
Visitors to
Princess.com, No.3 on the chart, spent about 44 minutes on its Web
site. And visitors to HollandAmerica.com, which was No. 5 on the
chart, after Imperial Majesty, spent 12 minutes on the Web site. So
Imperial Majesty could be driving people to its site, but its
conversion rate is likely very low.
Hitwise, a company
that compiles data on online usage and search behavior from a
sample of 10 million U.S. Internet users, has been collecting
weekly data for Travel Weekly on the top travel and cruise line Web
sites since March of this year. (Its latest rankings appear in
the chart at right.)
Hitwise partners
with Internet service providers to collect the data, giving it what
the company describes as the largest and most representative sample
in the U.S.
In these reports,
Hitwise gathered the top Web sites in the travel-cruises category,
which includes Web sites of cruise operators, agencies with a focus
on cruise vacations and Web sites that offer information on
cruises.
Travel sellers fare
well in these listings, with VacationsToGo.com consistently topping
the list. Cruises Only and Cruise.com are usually in the top 10,
while online giants Travelocity and Expedia don't even make the top
20.
In May, Orbitz came
in at No. 14 and Hotwire at No. 20, but this month's report showed
they had been bumped from the list, replaced by new Web sites like
All Seasons Travel. Cruise Critic, the online cruise review Web
site, and its message boards each took top 10 slots, as
well.
In these reports,
the cruise lines' Web sites consistently rank commensurately with
their size: Carnival, Royal Caribbean and Princess take the top
three cruise slots. Here, in contrast to
Nielsen/NetRatings, NCL ranks much higher than Holland America and
Celebrity, neither of which cracks the top 10.
The two-ship Disney
Cruise Line always makes the Hitwise chart, sometimes ahead of
Celebrity, indicating that it likely gets traction from the
uber-branding of its parent company.
Hitwise's results
remained relatively consistent until the week of May 19, when, for
the first time, the one-ship Imperial Majesty Cruise Line showed up
at No. 15, beating Celebrity, Disney, Orbitz and Hotwire.
Imperial Majesty
might not be a big player in the cruise line sector, but it has
clearly learned to play the Internet game.
To
contact reporter Johanna Jainchill, send e-mail to
[email protected].