t's hard to get them to go on the record, but they're out there. They own large agencies, small agencies and some even run travel agency consortia and brands.

They are retailers who either are uninterested in, or even embarrassed by, the lawsuits that travel agents are filing against the airlines.

The suits charge that big airlines colluded or conspired to reduce or eliminate travel agents' commissions. The stated goals of the suits vary, but include restoration of commissions, the award of damages and forced divestment of the consumer Web sites owned by the airlines.

Though many agents are passionate about the lawsuits against the airlines, the unconcerned parties don't see their position as betraying their profession. Rather, they fall into one of these camps:

• Those who believe that the lawyers will get rich and agents will get what amounts to promotional offers from airlines.

"Look what happened when ASTA settled. The lawyers got $30 million and we got scrip," one agent said. "I doubt [plaintiff] Sarah Hall's lawyers only got $100 bonus commission for working the Lufthansa settlement. But, of course, lawyers don't get paid at all unless they convince their clients to agree to a settlement."

• Those who have "moved on" and think fellow agents should just "get over it."

"Frankly, I think the airlines did collude," one midsize-agency owner said. "But I'm making more on the combination of fees and negotiated commission than I made under the old system. I don't want to go back."

• Those who believe that, despite everything, agents should be supporting the airlines.

"Like it or not, every trip starts on an airplane," a veteran agent told me. "We need them healthy. There's nothing to go after, anyway. [T-dub] is gone, United is in bankruptcy. And if we win a suit, it won't bring back the agencies that already have gone under."

One travel agent, who straddles the second and third bullet points, felt that the suit reflected poorly on agents. "She [Sarah Hall] doesn't speak on my behalf," he said. "Maybe she represents the group that's into the twilight of their careers. I'm just in the third inning. I think perhaps this is when we ought to extend the olive branch to the airlines and work on a solution together. Let's spend the same energy reinventing and reinvigorating the agency channel."

None of the agents I spoke with, incidentally, said they would send back a settlement check should one appear in their mailbox.

"If a check comes, I'll cash it," a large corporate agency president said. "But the paperwork for the Sarah Hall settlement was meaningless to me -- I already have an agreement with Lufthansa."

Two agents told me they believe base commission will come back without a lawsuit.

"It wasn't that long ago that we were getting only 7%," said the first, "then the airlines realized we were the cheapest channel, so they gave us 10%. Now they think they can do it cheaper without us, but that, too, will change."

A small agency owner agreed. "I hope we can be the most cost-effective channel again, and they'll come back to us -- without litigation. Agency cost is tied to GDSs, and the GDS issues are being worked through."

I think the sense of fatalism expressed by all the agents I spoke with is a reasonable response to the suits -- agent hopes have been dashed before.

But if a check does arrive, take a moment to thank Sarah Hall before you cash it -- while others watched and waited, she did an awful lot of heavy lifting.


From Our Partners

2021 Family Expo
Family Travel Expo
Register Now
Air Astana 1366
Air Astana
Read More
2021 Caesars Webinar
Watch Now

JDS Travel News JDS Viewpoints JDS Africa/MI