McGee: Debit memo cases could be handled: Travel Weekly

McGee: Debit memo cases could be handled

By
|

WASHINGTON -- The Travel Agent Arbiter could handle debit memo cases with little or no increase in staff and no immediate increase in funding, although it would have to develop a fee schedule for the cases.

So says the arbiter himself, Bill McGee, who also told Travel Weekly: "I think it could be practically an overnight transition if the parties agreed to send [debit memo cases] here."

Amending and strengthening the arbiter program to handle debit memo cases was one of three recommendations made by the National Commission to Ensure Consumer Information and Choice in the Travel Industry, which issued its report Nov. 13.

Technically, those disputes already could come before the arbiter. But both the agent and the airline have to agree to bring any airline-agent disputes to the arbiter.

As a result, only one of the arbiter's 6,000 or so cases since its creation in 1987 has been for an airline-agent dispute, in 1995, McGee said. It was not a debit memo case.

The rest of the cases are ARC-agent disputes.

McGee said he gets two or three calls a week from agents who want to bring debit memo cases to the arbiter.

But then he tells them they also need the consent of the airline, and "I never hear from them again."

The arbiter program was established as a separate nonprofit corporation as part of the 1987 settlement of an ARTA lawsuit against ARC. Half of its funding comes from airline contributions and half from agencies' annual ARC fee.

The arbiter program board meets once a year and includes three representatives for agents -- one each from ASTA, ARTA and AAA -- and three from airlines, which at the moment are Delta, US Airways and Japan Air Lines.

McGee said he's mentioned the debit memo issue before, possibly as far back at the first meeting 15 years ago. There has never been a consensus, but he said the sentiment seemed to have changed at the last annual meeting a few weeks ago.

"We tentatively made arrangements to get together after the first of the year" to discuss it again, McGee said.

Under the national commission's recommendation, the Transportation Department also would get involved. Congress would direct the DOT to convene airline and agency representatives and report back within six months on their progress.

The commission said the rules also should preclude airlines from retaliating against agents who seek or defend arbitration.

The arbiter program has a two-person staff, with McGee as the only arbiter. But McGee said he thinks the current staff can handle it and, if not, a part-time arbiter could be hired.

The cost of ARC-agent cases is covered by member fees paid by agents and airlines. But McGee said he is supposed to create a fee schedule for cases in which ARC is not involved.

Staff and funding issues could depend on how many debit memo cases come before the arbiter. It also could depend on whether the rules are written to allow most of those cases to be handled on paper, as the national commission suggested, instead of with an oral hearing.

McGee said most of the arbiter's cases already are handled on paper.

From Our Partners


From Our Partners

MSC Cruises: A Year in Motion — Learn More, $ell More
MSC Cruises: A Year in Motion — Learn More, $ell More
Register Now
Revenue, Retention and Risk: The Business Case for Integrated Travel Insurance Technology
Revenue, Retention and Risk: The Business Case for Integrated Travel Insurance Technology
Read More
Destination Weddings & Honeymoons
Destination Weddings & Honeymoons
Register Now

JDS Travel News JDS Viewpoints JDS Africa/MI