Tightening the Vise: Travel Weekly

Tightening the Vise

By
|

RC's announcement that it will require agencies to report their sales daily is the latest airline attempt to tighten the vise on the distribution system.

The carriers' strategy has been clear for nearly a decade: reduce compensation, discourage smaller agencies from remaining in business and make the procedures agencies must follow as difficult as possible.

The airlines' goals are working: according to the federal commission that released a report on distribution last week, a third of U.S. agencies have failed in the last eight years.

The ARC announcement about daily reports used the airlines' financial plight as the major justification for the new requirement. The airlines have to see the agency data on a more timely basis, ARC advised, in order to conduct their business. Does anyone believe that seeing the results of agency sales daily rather than weekly will solve the airlines' woes?

A second rationale for the move was an accusation of agency fraud in conjunction with the voiding of tickets. ARC maintained that there is a rising tide of fraudulent activity and that weekly reporting makes such malfeasance easier to accomplish, giving unscrupulous agencies more time to do their deeds.

As usual, ARC provided no documentation to support this broad characterization of the agency industry.

Perhaps the most virulent part of the ARC statement was the section that insisted that the airlines were taking this action in order to preserve the agency distribution system. There was a thinly veiled threat that the airlines would seek other avenues if agencies weren't more accountable. It must have come as a shock to agencies that the carriers might seek alternatives to retail distribution.

The airlines would get rid of most travel agencies tomorrow if they could sell as many or more tickets at lower cost. But they can't and they know it.

They also know, or should know, that the level of services they provide is woefully inferior to the service that is available through agencies.

Small case in point: the other day I decided to cash in some miles in order to get upgrades on a forthcoming trip. I had gotten the ticket from our corporate travel agency but called the airlines' frequent flyer number to do the upgrades.

The airline agent told me I had to pay $50 to cash in the miles because it was less than thirty days before departure. In taking my credit card information, she forgot to ask for the expiration date on the card. I thought that was odd but let it go.

A few days later the airline called to say it couldn't process the transaction because its agent had forgotten to get the expiration date. The airline asked me to call back. Of course it didn't give me the number of the original agent or of the agent making the follow-up call. So I had to call the general number and go through the agonizingly long tape before a human answered.

Then when I got the pick-of the-draw agent on the phone, he sounded unhappy, dull and confused. Eventually he entered the expiration date and said the transaction was complete.

The conversation left me with a lack of confidence that all was well. It also left me with a renewed confidence that airlines will never be able to replace travel agencies.

From Our Partners


From Our Partners

MSC Cruises: A Year in Motion — Learn More, $ell More
MSC Cruises: A Year in Motion — Learn More, $ell More
Register Now
Revenue, Retention and Risk: The Business Case for Integrated Travel Insurance Technology
Revenue, Retention and Risk: The Business Case for Integrated Travel Insurance Technology
Read More
Destination Weddings & Honeymoons
Destination Weddings & Honeymoons
Register Now

JDS Travel News JDS Viewpoints JDS Africa/MI