Is airline Internet-bypass grounds for nullifying a CRS contract?: Travel Weekly

Q: You have previously written that, if an airline owning a CRS intentionally diverts bookings to its own Internet site, the agency could have grounds for getting out of the CRS contract. Has any vendor put such an escape clause into a CRS contract? If not, what language should we suggest to the vendors with which we are now negotiating?

A: No vendor has yet agreed to amend its standard contract to permit the agency to terminate because of CRS bypass. With rare exceptions, no vendor has even agreed to meaningful reductions in quotas or bonus thresholds for the lost bookings. However, if you have the time and negotiating power, I strongly urge you to try to obtain such provisions from vendors with which you are now negotiating.

Internet bypass can affect CRS deals in three different ways, and you should try to cover all three.

First, since reduced CRS bookings can hurt your ability to meet your quota, you should try to obtain a provision that will automatically reduce the quota for any increase in bypass.

Second, since bypass will also inhibit achievement of quarterly or annual thresholds for bonuses, including growth bonuses that you thought you could count on, you need to try to find a way to get the same bonuses with lower thresholds.

Finally, if bypass becomes very widespread, affecting your ability to stay in business, you need a way to terminate the contract.

The hard parts are how to define "bypass" and how to find a measurable and mutually agreeable way of determining its extent. If you are worried about loss of identifiable corporate clients, try this language:

"In the event an airline owning 10% or more of the ownership interest of [CRS vendor] induces any corporate client to make reservations through the Internet, then the [quota and threshold] shall be reduced by the monthly average [or total] of bookings [per CRT] made by [the travel agency] during the preceding 12 months. In the event that such reductions total more than 25% of [the travel agency's] total bookings for the previous 12 months, [the travel agency] may terminate this Agreement on 90 days written notice to [CRS vendor]."

The quoted language would apply only to Sabre and Worldspan, which are the two remaining vendors owned by U.S. airlines. Galileo and Amadeus will probably never agree to escape clauses geared to bypass, as each is as much a potential victim of bypass as you are.

Mark Pestronk is a Fairfax, Va.-based attorney specializing in travel law. He answers your questions in the Crossroads' Legal Issues Forum.

From Our Partners


From Our Partners

GTM North America Supplier Spotlight Part 2
GTM North America Supplier Spotlight Part 2
Register Now
Sponsored Video: New Orleans on Cruises and Advisor Perks
Sponsored Video: New Orleans on Cruises and Advisor Perks
Read More
Sani/Ikos Group: Luxury Beachfront Resorts in Greece & Spain
Sani/Ikos Group: Luxury Beachfront Resorts in Greece & Spain
Register Now

JDS Travel News JDS Viewpoints JDS Africa/MI