The House passed a five-year reauthorization of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on Friday, with several measures that ASTA says will be harmful to travel agents and consumers.
ASTA spoke out against the bill's regulations that it says would make it harder for consumers to comparison-shop airfares as well as require travel agents to make multiple new disclosures, which includes information that airlines are not compelled to share with agents, like ancillary fee data.
"Repealing the DOT's full-price rule would undermine a key consumer protection principle ASTA holds dear -- that consumers should know the full cost of air travel before purchasing a ticket," ASTA's executive vice president for advocacy Eben Peck wrote in a letter last week to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. "We believe public sentiment is with us on this issue."
Kurt Ebenhoch, executive director of the Air Travel Fairness Coalition, also took issue with what he called "misguided language [that] will spell the end of easy air travel comparison shopping for consumers."
"The airlines have again manipulated a captive Congress into doing something that is bad for consumers, bad for businesses and bad for the overall economy," he said.
The House overwhelmingly passed the legislation, 393-13, which now heads to the Senate. The bill had stalled earlier this year due to a proposed provision to privatize air traffic control, which was removed from the final legislation.
Michael McCormick, CEO of the Global Business Travel Association, commended the bill's passage, saying the "continued investment in the nation's air traffic system, U.S. airports and consumer protections are necessary to the long-term health of business travel and the economy."
Airlines for America, the airline industry's lobbying group, applauded the bill's passage. CEO Nicholas Calio urged the Senate to pass the legislation and continue to "hold the line against unneeded tax hikes, while also protecting our customers from ill-advised calls to regulate pricing and services across the industry."
However, the Airports Council International North America was disappointed with the bill for not raising the cap on the Passenger Facility Charge, which airports can implement at their discretion to fund airport improvement projects.
"[The bill] falls short in addressing the long-term infrastructure needs of our aviation system," the group said in a joint statement with the American Association of Airport Executives. "While the administration and Congress continue to talk about infrastructure investment, much more needs to be done to address the systemic funding problems that put airports of all sizes at a significant disadvantage for modernizing their facilities to meet the needs of air passengers and local communities."
The U.S. Travel Association also lamented the bill for its lack of infrastructure funding, for a measure that it says will undermine open skies policies and for making it more difficult for new, low-cost international carriers to fly to the U.S.
"While America seeks to regain its lost share of the international travel market, it is critical that we allow for competition and give travelers more, not fewer, choices," senior vice president for government relations Tori Barnes said in a statement, adding that the association hopes to work with the Senate to address these issues for its version of the bill.