Sabres Efficient Access Solution is no big win for agencies: Travel Weekly

Q: Sabre is trying to camouflage an enormous financial blow to travel agencies by dressing it up as an attractive new program called Efficient Access Solution. Sabre is pressuring our agency to agree to the voluntary program, under which my agencys segment incentive will be cut from $1.20 to 40 cents.  If we agree to this 67% cut in return for access to all fares on participating carriers and freedom from service fees levied by those carriers, what will our new legal rights be? What will happen to us if we dont agree by signing the EAS amendment to our Sabre contract? If bad things happen, what will our legal rights be?

A: Sabre executives claim that EAS is a victory for agencies, which will now be assured of key benefits and protections, including full content and protection from service fees. However, it is by no means clear that Sabres expensive insurance policy protects you from anything more than a phantom menace.

Aside from revenue cut, the trouble with the EAS program is this: If the major airlines dont hurt nonparticipating agencies, participating agencies will be no better off under the program, and they may not be able to get out of it.

Sabre has asked agencies to sign an amendment that is so totally one-sided that it appears to have emerged from a legal committee whose mission was to draft meaningless happy talk while leaving agencies as powerless as possible. Careful perusal of this amendment shows that:

" Once in the program, an agency can get out only if the programs benefits become materially decreased, which is undefined and will no doubt be interpreted by Sabre to mean that you cant get out as long as the current airlines stay in, even if they never levy fees on nonparticipating agencies or never block their access to content.

" Participating airlines commitments can be short-term, whereas you must participate for the duration of your GDS contract. So, if a single major airline drops out and hits you with fees in 18 months, it is not clear that you have suffered a material decrease in benefits.

" Sabre can modify any component of the program unilaterally by posting a notice on a Web site. So, Sabre can increase your cut from 80 cents to your entire $1.20, and you would have no right to get out of the program or your Sabre contract.

If you nevertheless feel that you need to get into the EAS program, you should at least try to have Sabre agree to change the standard EAS amendment to give you better termination rights and protection against further incentive cuts.

If you decide not to join, you probably cannot terminate your Sabre contract if airlines start blocking content or making you pay fees for access to fares. Under the standard Sabre contract in effect since early 2004, you can only terminate if Sabre forces you to accept a cut in your incentives.

Correction: In my recent column about Expedias financial results ["Expedias sales slide: Good news for brick-and-mortar shops?," June 5, 2006], I said that during the first quarter of 2006, Expedias domestic airline bookings grew by 10%. However, I should have omitted the word airline, as Expedia does not separately disclose its airline bookings. Expedia also took issue with my comparing its 3% ticket-transaction growth unfavorably with TQ3Navigants 10% transaction growth; Expedias air and nonair transactions grew 12%.

Mark Pestronk is a Washington-based attorney specializing in travel law.

From Our Partners


From Our Partners

Fiesta Americana Travelty Collection, What Advisors Need to Know
Fiesta Americana Travelty Collection, What Advisors Need to Know
Register Now
Revenue, Retention and Risk: The Business Case for Integrated Travel Insurance Technology
Revenue, Retention and Risk: The Business Case for Integrated Travel Insurance Technology
Read More
Going Beyond: Extraordinary Experiential Experiences
Going Beyond: Extraordinary Experiential Experiences
Register Now

JDS Travel News JDS Viewpoints JDS Africa/MI