Will the DOT limit GDS contracts?: Travel Weekly

I have read that the Department of Transportation is proposing to limit the length of GDS contracts to three years and to do away with productivity pricing, damages based on lost bookings and even segment bonuses.

Is this true? Will it really happen? If so, will it affect my current five-year deal?

A: It is true the DOT is leaning toward outlawing GDS contracts in excess of three years. This is the current rule in the European Union and Canada, and the DOT always has felt that longer contracts restrict use of multiple systems, which could give consumers a better choice.

The DOT is going even further and thinking about adopting the E.U. rule that lets travel agencies terminate contracts on 90 days' notice after the first year.

The DOT does not like the "lost booking fee" damages that some GDS vendors claim when a travel agency breaches its contract by early termination, so it tentatively also is proposing to outlaw those damage claims.

All that is good news for travel agencies that have hated long contracts with no escape clauses.

On the other hand, for productive, corporate-oriented agencies that depend on large segment bonuses, there is bad news indeed: The DOT is proposing to outlaw all productivity pricing, apparently including quotas for free service as well as segment bonuses.

Clearly, corporate agencies need to try to get the DOT to maintain the status quo on productivity pricing. As a fallback position, agencies might wish to urge the DOT to scrap all of its GDS rules, leaving contract terms entirely to the market.

I predict the DOT will adopt almost all these proposals, unless agencies present cogent arguments against them. In any event, it may be another year before we know the final rules.

However, I predict that whatever the final rules are, they will apply to all existing GDS contracts. After all, there is ample precedent.

In 1985, existing contracts longer than five years were simply shortened to the five-year maximum allowed by the new rules.

Again, in 1992, so-called "minimum-use" clauses in existing GDS contracts became null and void.

Mark Pestronk is a Fairfax, Va.-based attorney specializing in travel law. He answers your questions in the TravelWeekly.com Legal Ease forum. To contact Mark directly, e-mail him at [email protected].

From Our Partners


From Our Partners

Sani/Ikos Group: Luxury Beachfront Resorts in Greece & Spain
Sani/Ikos Group: Luxury Beachfront Resorts in Greece & Spain
Register Now
Revenue, Retention and Risk: The Business Case for Integrated Travel Insurance Technology
Revenue, Retention and Risk: The Business Case for Integrated Travel Insurance Technology
Read More
Sponsored Video: New Orleans on Cruises and Advisor Perks
Sponsored Video: New Orleans on Cruises and Advisor Perks
Read More

JDS Travel News JDS Viewpoints JDS Africa/MI