Lawsuit claims U.S. network airlines colluded to inflate multicity fares

|

Airline passengers and travel agents filed an antitrust lawsuit against American Airlines, Delta and United, alleging that the three carriers conspired to inflate fares for multicity itineraries in the U.S.

The lawsuit, which included more than 40 plaintiffs, was filed Monday in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco. It included the Airline Tariff Publishing Co. (ATPCO) as a defendant.

The complaint alleges that starting April 1, the three carriers conspired to enact pricing policies in which multi-leg itineraries were priced much higher than if the customer bought each leg separately as one-way tickets.

“Plaintiffs are now required to expend an inordinate amount of time booking individual one-way legs of multicity flights in order to save their customers hundreds, and in some cases thousands, of dollars they would otherwise be required to pay as a result of the airline defendants’ price fix,” the complaint reads. “In many cases, the time required to book the identical multicity trip has increased from approximately five minutes to 20 minutes or more by reason of the need to enter full data sets for each passenger on each one-way leg and obtain a Personal Name Report (“PNR”) for each leg. This is a time-consuming process for which plaintiffs cannot be compensated.”

Additionally, the carriers enacted more restrictions that “eliminated the ‘combinability’ of lower, nonrefundable, one-way fares,” further boosting ticket prices, according to the complaint.

ATPCO was included as a defendant because “it aids, abets and enables its airline owners, including the airline defendants, to fix prices on airfares,” the complaint reads.

American, Delta and United account for more than 70% of revenue from U.S. airline passengers, according to the complaint.

American said the plaintiffs' claims were "completely without merit."

“We recently made a unilateral change to our fare rules to ensure that new lower fares we introduced would be available to passengers flying the route for which the fares were intended. In doing so we eliminated what was, in effect, a loophole in the fare rules that allowed some people to construct connections that combined two nonstop fares,” said American Airlines spokesman Casey Norton.

United spokesman Jonathan Guerin said, “We strongly disagree with the contention that United’s recent changes in its fare rule are a result of illegal coordination. The combinability rule had permitted connecting customers to circumvent United’s inventory controls and combine the two one-way fares into the same ticket, resulting in prices that were different than what United intended for the connecting itinerary. United changed fare rules to disallow these unintended fare combinations.” 

From Our Partners


From Our Partners

Destinations on a Plate: Culinary Tourism
Destinations on a Plate: Culinary Tourism
Watch Now
TTC Tour Brands — How We Lead: What Tour Directors Know About Leadership
TTC Tour Brands — How We Lead: What Tour Directors Know About Leadership
Read More
What High Growth Advisors Do Differently
What High Growth Advisors Do Differently
Register Now

JDS Travel News JDS Viewpoints JDS Africa/MI